找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
总共850条微博

动态微博

查看: 3959|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

What is wrong with this method to find limit?

[复制链接]

105

主题

381

帖子

6171

积分

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-16 18:28:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

[Question]
What is (2^0.5)^(2^0.5)^(2^0.5)...?

Here is a solution.www.ddhw.com

Let it be x, then we get x=(2^0.5)^x. It seems it will lead x=2 or 4.

The limit should be unique.  What is wrong with this method?

Someone said that if x^x^x... (x>0) has a finite limit, x should
be <=e^(1/e).  If he was right, then the maximum limit of x^x^x...
is e.  So 4 cannot be the answer and 2 is.  Is there a way to get
the answer directly (which is 2) and not use the maximum limit e to
reject 4?
www.ddhw.com

 
回复

使用道具 举报

15

主题

46

帖子

831

积分

沙发
发表于 2009-12-25 00:24:05 | 只看该作者

回复:What is wrong with this method to find limit?


I think you have to make sure that the limit is approaching 2 from below so that you can reject the answer of 4.  Here is the proof for
(2^0.5) (2^0.5)^(2^0.5)... < 2 for finite terms.
 www.ddhw.com
1. since (2^0.5) < 2
2. then (2^0.5)^(2^0.5) < (2^0.5)^2=2
3. and (2^0.5)^(2^0.5)^(2^0.5) < (2^0.5)^2 = 2
4. further more
(2^0.5)^(2^0.5)^(2^0.5) ... < 2 for
 
So answer 4 should be rejected by using your method, which is mathematically sound.
 


 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

105

主题

381

帖子

6171

积分

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-26 02:49:28 | 只看该作者

thanks a lot. What I do not understand is how


it got an extra solution 4.   If you have some idea, please let me know.  I posted this one in wxc and Dr. math.  I have not got good answers.


 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

128

主题

550

帖子

8036

积分

地板
发表于 2009-12-26 10:07:40 | 只看该作者

回复:What is wrong with this method to find limit?


The limit is infinite.
www.ddhw.com

 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

105

主题

381

帖子

6171

积分

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-26 19:10:30 | 只看该作者

回复:回复:What is wrong with this method to find limit


the 2nd post says it is <=2.


 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

128

主题

550

帖子

8036

积分

6#
发表于 2009-12-26 19:59:06 | 只看该作者

回复:回复:回复:What is wrong with this method to find li


That proof does not seems to be right. 1,2,3 are OK, but how 4 is achieved?

www.ddhw.com

原贴:
文章来源: yma16® 于 2009-12-26 11:10:30 (北京时间: 2009-12-27 0:10:30)
标题:回复:回复:What is wrong with this method to find limit


the 2nd post says it is <=2.


 

www.ddhw.com

 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

15

主题

46

帖子

831

积分

7#
发表于 2009-12-28 21:22:23 | 只看该作者

回复:回复:回复:回复:What is wrong with this method to find


Can you think of 1,2,3 as steps in a "mathematical induction" procedure?   And 4 is the conclusion.  Good luck.
 
www.ddhw.com

 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

15

主题

46

帖子

831

积分

8#
发表于 2009-12-28 21:50:48 | 只看该作者

It is an "irrational" number!


Let me try to answer it. 
I guess we can blame the "irrationality" of the number for the strange solution of 4 you got.  
(2^0.5) is an irrational number.   You are dealing with the irrational power of an irrational number.  What is the meaning of an irrational power of an irrational number ? Can it be rational or irrational?www.ddhw.com
I guess the answer is both.   It is very strange.   Very often, when we turn an infinite series into a finite algebraic equation to solve, we inevitably "added" something to the original problem.   You have to rely on somthing else, being physical meaning or math reasoning, to get the right answer.
I hope this is the case.  Let us know you have something else to explain for the "4".  www.ddhw.com
  
www.ddhw.com

 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

128

主题

550

帖子

8036

积分

9#
发表于 2009-12-29 02:44:10 | 只看该作者

回复:回复:回复:回复:回复:What is wrong with this method to f


You are right. I think I misunderstood the order of x^x^x^x.... -- I thought I had fell in such a 'pit' once before...


 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

105

主题

381

帖子

6171

积分

10#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-1 04:41:35 | 只看该作者

回复:It is an "irrational" number!


2^0.5 is the only case to lead two solutions.  If you try 3^(1/3) or 5^0.2, it will not introduce an extra solution. 
www.ddhw.com

 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

15

主题

46

帖子

831

积分

11#
发表于 2010-1-6 00:33:10 | 只看该作者

回复:回复:It is an "irrational" number!


Maybe it has somthing to do with the fact that 2 is the only even prime number!Xiangdang's Conjecture!
www.ddhw.com

 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

105

主题

381

帖子

6171

积分

12#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-12 00:30:14 | 只看该作者

回复:What is wrong with this method to find limit?


I think the method does not work.  However, I do not know why.  The
reason the method does not work is the following,

Consider x^x^x... (x>0).  Replace x with 10^(1/10), using this
method, we will get the result 10.  But 10^(1/10) is smaller than 2^
(1/2).  So the result should be smaller than 2, which was the
solution of (2^0.5)^(2^0.5)^(2^0.5)..., by using this method.
www.ddhw.com

 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

24小时热帖
    一周热门
      原创摄影
        美食美文
          您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

          本版积分规则

          Archiver|手机版|珍珠湾ART

          Powered by Discuz! X3 © 2001-2013 All Rights Reserved