据我对美国法律的了解, 无罪, 小偷死了白死. |
无罪 私闯民宅 在不是被主人邀请的情况下进入 主人就可以自卫 棒球棒不算杀伤性武器 主人也没有想置小偷于死地的意图 小偷摸口袋拿枪这个细节很难考证 老婆孩子都在房间里 男主人是当事人 小偷已经死了 所以这个细节应该不做考虑 不管怎么说 死了白死.. |
有罪啊,那个人对他已经没有生命威胁了.他还要动手.不过可以讲过失杀人. |
有罪,如果小偷死在他家,可能无罪,小偷跑出他家被打死,应该有罪 |
有罪无罪就要看有无证据那小偷弯腰掏东西的证据了,这点可以通过法医从棒击角度来分析。 |
有罪,但是过失杀人罪,丈夫不应该跟出去追赶,而且拿着棒球棍,至少有故意伤人的动机了,而是应该马上报警,追赶罪犯是警察的职责! |
to what I understand the law, he is no guilty. |
Criminal law in each state is different so that without knowing which state it is not possible to argue one way or the other. Under common law, a home owner can use deadly force to protect his or her house but only when he is encountering life threatening force. In this case, the thief committed a burglary, which is a felony. However, burglary is not a robbery which could give the homeowner rights to use deadly force. There is no information on whether the thief actually took anything and the thief is not using force or threatening to use force, as the owner believed to be, such that it does not amount to a robbery. Under the circumstances the homeowner committed murder, most likely 2nd degree. Involuntary manslaughter is also another likely charge. Under some state laws, a home owner can use deadly force to prevent a fleeing felon. But under Tennessee v. Garner, the Supreme Court made it clear that only when felon threatened with serious bodily injury or death, no deadly weapon can be used. Other state laws will allow protection of a home but in this case the owner did not aim to protect his house but to get revenge, more likely. BTW, if a base bat is not a deadly weapon, I don't know what it is. A fist can be considered deadly weapon. |
BTW. The likely charge is murder because he had intent to kill or inflict serious bodiy harm, which can be inferred from deadly weapon doctrine. |
应该有罪的.. 已经出了家门了 小偷身上又没有凶器 应该是过失杀人之类 |
不存在自卫杀人理由--1、这时贼人也知道自己被发现了,于是夺门而出,仓皇出逃。 2、弯下腰来,同时右手伸入口袋,像是要掏东西(很明显,这时掏枪的动作)--这只是假设,沒实则证据支持生命受威脅。 兇嫌动机是一级谋杀--举起棒球棍朝那人头上狠狠砸去。 官判--过失杀人--丈夫吓坏了,赶紧拨打911,把他送去医院。 |
谢谢楼上朋友们的回答。“杨佳”,“加跟贴”,“oldfarmerman”,“flashway”和“Solon”给出了很好的解答。特别是“加跟贴”的详细解释,给人留下深刻印象,也令人信服。 2008年一部比较受欢迎的电影在美国发行,电影的名字是Felon。我出的这个问题,就是这部电影开始的情节。当然这部电影最主要的是描述片中主人公Mr. Porter 在监狱的经历。但是最开始着这部分情节让我感到有点意外,因为我与“husonghu”,“lurker”,“a reader”等朋友们的看法一样,认为Porter无罪。但是在影片中,检察官还是对他依法逮捕,理由是,小偷已经逃出门外,尽管小偷偷了钱,但是他对Porter一家人已经没生命威胁。正确的做法应该是,Porter呆在家里,拨打911报警,而不是追出门外。 正因为如此,在影片中,Porter 最终认罪,接受 3rd degree Involuntary manslaughter,被处以3年监禁。当然他可以选择不认罪,然后会受到更严厉的起诉并将在法庭判决。 |
有罪,属于故意杀人罪。 小偷是偷了你的钱财,可是你打他的地方不是在你家, 时间不是他在行窃的时候,这种情况底下你应该叫小偷留下来,给警察打电话,让警察叔叔来解决,而不能滥用私刑 |
支持!
|
欢迎光临 珍珠湾ART (http://zzwav.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3 |